Cover of: United States-Norway arbitration under the special agreement of June 30, 1921 | United States

United States-Norway arbitration under the special agreement of June 30, 1921

Argument of the United States of America
  • 409 Pages
  • 3.40 MB
  • 3496 Downloads
  • English
by
Government Printing Office , Washington
World War, 1914-1918 -- Confiscations and contributions -- United States, Norway -- Claims vs. United S

Places

Norway, United St

ContributionsDennis, William Cullen, b. 1878., Sutherland, George, 1862-1942., Permanent Court of Arbitration.
Classifications
LC ClassificationsJX238 .N72 1922e
The Physical Object
Paginationxi, 409 p.
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL6659631M
LC Control Number23026265
OCLC/WorldCa3473011

Whereas in pursuance of all the foregoing, by a special Agreement con-cluded on the 30th of Juneand ratified on the 22nd of August 3 1921 book United States of America File Size: KB.

Get this from a library. United States--Norway arbitration under the special agreement of J Counter-case of the United States of America. [William Cullen Dennis; George Sutherland; United States.; Permanent Court of Arbitration.]. WHEREAS in pursuance of all the foregoing, by a special Agreement concluded on the 30th of Juneand ratified on the 22nd of August [4] the United States of America and His Majesty the King of Norway “desiring to settle amicably certain claims of Norwegian subjects against the United.

United States-Norway arbitration under the special agreement of J additional evidence submitted on behalf of the United States: August 9, United States-Norway arbitration under the special agreement of J Argument of the United States of America By United States., George Sutherland, William Cullen Dennis and Permanent Court of Arbitration.

one of the parties to the arbitration agreement lacks legal capacity, or the agreement is invalid under the laws to which the parties have agreed or, failing such agreement, under Norwegian law. IN THE ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT.

BETWEEN. MOBIL INVESTMENTS CANADA INC. & MURPHY OIL CORPORATION (Claimants) AND. CANADA (Respondent) ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4. DECISION ON LIABILITY AND ON PRINCIPLES OF QUANTUM. Tribunal. Professor Hans. Under the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law and the North American Free Trade Agreement (Case No.

UNCT/14/2) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY. Claimant. GOVERNMENT OF CANADA. Respondent. CLAIMANT’S COMMENTS ON APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS SUBMISSIONS.

Download United States-Norway arbitration under the special agreement of June 30, 1921 FB2

Richard G. Dearden Wendy. under the arbitration rules of the united nations commission on international trade law and the north american free trade agreement grand river enterprises six nations ltd., jerry montour, kenneth hill and arthur montour, claimants / investors - and - the government of the united states of america respondent / party.

ARTICLE 7 - THE ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL The parties may agree on the number of Arbitrators. If they have not so agreed, the number of Arbitrators in each case shall be three. However, in special circumstances, the Institute may determine that a dispute shall be decided by a single Size: KB. United States--Norway arbitration under the Special agreement of J case of the United States of America [and appendix Documentary evidence] By United States, b.

William Cullen Dennis and Permanent Court of Arbitration. United States-Norway arbitration under the special agreement of J Argument of the United States of America.

Details United States-Norway arbitration under the special agreement of June 30, 1921 EPUB

Author: William Cullen Dennis ; George Sutherland ; United States. United States--Norway arbitration under the special agreement of J Case of the United States of America [and Appendix Documentary evidence].

United States - Norway Arbitration under the special agreement of J Additional evidence submitted on behalf of the United States. Proceedings of the Tribunal of arbitration convened at the Hague under the provisions of the special agreement between the United States of America and Norway concluded at Washington, June 30th,for the submission to arbitration of certain claims of Norwegian subjects against the United States arising out of certain requisitions of the.

United States - Norway arbitration under the special agreement of J Additional evidence submitted on behalf of the United States Ocean. The Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Institute of the Oslo Chamber of Commerce is able to offer the following methods of dispute resolution: Arbitration, fast-track arbitration, mediation and mini-trial, and many combinations of these.

Decision [eng] Special Agreement, June 30th, Award of the Tribunal Award of the tribunal of arbitration between the United States of America and the Kingdom of Norway under the special agreement of J The Hague, October, 13, United States--Norway arbitration under the special agreement of J Additional evidence submitted on behalf of the United States.

United States vs. Mexico. Report of Jackson H. Ralston, agent of the United States and of counsel in the matter of the case of the Pious fund of the Californias. in the matter of an arbitration commenced pursuant to the agreement between the government of the kingdom of norway and the government of the republic of poland on the promotion and reciprocal protection of investments, signed on 5 june - and - the arbitration rules of the united nations commission on international trade law - between.

United States-Norway arbitration under the special agreement of J Argument of the United States of America United States July 4, Pursuant to Article 8of the Treaty, this arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the UNCITRAL Rules.

By agreement of the Parties, the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (the “PCA”) acts as the appointing authority in this arbitration for all purposes under the UNCITRAL Rules.

Permanent Court of Arbitration, Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration Convened at The Hague under the Provisions of the Special Agreement between the United States of America and Norway Concluded at Washington, J (The Hague, ). The award is also printed in S.

Doc. 67th Cong., 4th sess. —v Abstract. Includes appendix entitled "Documentary Evidence," head of title: Permanent court of arbitration at The Hague. United States-Norway arbitration, under the special agreement of J Mode of access: InternetAuthor: Norway.

and United States. United States-Norway arbitration under the special agreement of J Argument of the United States of America: Unto the Right Honourable the Lords of Council and Session, the petition of Captain George Sutherland of Forse.

Discover Book Depository's huge selection of William Cullen Dennis books online. Free delivery worldwide on over 20 million titles. United States-Norway Arbitration Under the Special Agreement of J Counter-Case of the United States of America United States-Norway Arbitration Under the Special Agreement of J in the matter of an arbitration under the agreement between the government of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and the government of the republic of bolivia for the promotion and protection of investments, signed on 24 may - and - the uncitral aribtration rules - between - glencore finance (bermuda) limited.

Description United States-Norway arbitration under the special agreement of June 30, 1921 PDF

in the arbitration under chapter eleven of the north american free trade agreement and the uncitral arbitration rules between glamis gold ltd., claimant/investor, and united states of america, respondent/party.))))))))) amicus curiae submissions of friends of the earth canada and friends of the earth united states i.

introduction 1. Arbitration: Arbitration means that the resolution of a dispute which the parties are free to refer to a private Tribunal, is left to such Tribunal.

An Arbitration Agreement excludes the regular courts from dealing with and resolving the dispute. Under an ad hoc arbitration, procedure is governed solely by the Swedish Arbitration Act of unless the parties agree on another set of rules. Compared to ad hoc arbitration, institutional arbitration gives higher cost predictability and control, supervision in respect of the time limits of the arbitration, independent control of conflicts.

Ten Cate, Irene, Multi-Party and Multi-Contract Arbitrations: Procedural Mechanisms and Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements Under U.S. Law (). American Review of International Arbitration, Vol. 15, p.; Marquette Law School Legal Studies by: 2.The Arbitration Act of June 14 no.

25 applies to arbitration in Norway. The Norwegian Arbitration Act is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law, and is thus internationally adapted. The rules of the Institute are harmonized with both the Norwegian Arbitration Act .Permanent Court of Arbitration: United States - Norway Arbitration under the special agreement of J Additional evidence submitted on behalf of the United States.

August 9, (Washington, Govt. Print. Off., []), also by United States. American Agency for the United States - Norway Arbitration and Norway.